| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pamnade
Newbie
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 2
|
 Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 6:10 pm Post subject: Buying T Max |
 |
|
Hi Ya'all
I'm looking to purchase a T max in the near future and I am looking for advice. Can't afford a new one so looking at around £2500/£3000 budget. Can you advise on differences between a mk1 and mk2. Like what year did they change over and what changed. Is it better to find a low mileage mk1 or go the whole hog for a mk2, are they that improved?
I have noticed the clocks are different for a start.
Ade
|
|
| Back to top |
|
MrGrumpy
I Like To Post A Lot!
Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 180
Karma: +6
Location: Teesside
|
| Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 6:27 pm Post subject: Re: Buying T Max |
|
|
The mk2s came in in 2004. Its tricky to say whether the changes are worth it or not - there are many worthwhile differences, but the essence of the bike is very similar. Main differences - fuel injection with 4.5 extra bhp (useful) - economy very similar, bigger front forks, 2 front disks instead of 1, 15" rear wheel, radial tyres, fitted immobiliser, new clocks plus tiny cosmetic changes.
Slightly different feel to the handling - the mk2 is more planted, whilst the mk1 had a lighter feel, but needs 'riding' more. mk1 forks a little bouncy for my taste, so mk2 possibly better ride & handling.
Pros for mk2 - more grunt, better suspension, better brakes
Cons for mk2 - more expensive to run - the radial tyres are pricy, and 2 lots of brake pads & disks to replace!
I'd prefer a mk2, but there isn't a huge amount in it - depends on how much extra you have to pay! Mileage isn't really an issue - T-maxs are generally very reliable and develop few problems as they get older. However, like anything, it needs proper servicing, so a FSH is a good idea.
Hope that helps
Tim
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Scootmax500
Purveyor of fine wines and women
Joined: 22 Jun 2007
Posts: 1407
Karma: +41
Location: North Yorkshire
|
| Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 6:28 pm Post subject: Re: Buying T Max |
|
|
| pamnade wrote: | Hi Ya'all
I'm looking to purchase a T max in the near future and I am looking for advice. Can't afford a new one so looking at around £2500/£3000 budget. Can you advise on differences between a mk1 and mk2. Like what year did they change over and what changed. Is it better to find a low mileage mk1 or go the whole hog for a mk2, are they that improved?
I have noticed the clocks are different for a start.
Ade |
All the info you require is in the archive or available on the internet. For that budget, you should be ablt to get a late Mk1 53/04 or a well used Mk2 (if you can find one).
.......and a proper intro is the polite norm on here  _________________ 
Rutland 2008
Sunny North York Moors and Whitby 2008
Wet Withernsea rideout 2007
Caspe, Spain and Back 2006 |
|
| Back to top |
|
boboking
The Emperor
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 10742
Karma: +139
Location: Leicester!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Max500
Bit Of A Post Whore
Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 677
Karma: +36
Location: Fylde Coast
|
| Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 8:40 pm Post subject: Re: Buying T Max |
|
|
| MrGrumpy wrote: |
Cons for mk2 - more expensive to run - the radial tyres are pricy, and 2 lots of brake pads & disks to replace!
Tim |
...but also as both discs work together, pad wear is halved over the same mileage, so they last a lot longer. I just checked mine at 7,500 miles and they were barely worn. the rear was slightly more worn but still not even halfway. The X9 would wear both front sets out in less miles, although the material thickness is a lot less when new than on the Yamaha pads.
£20 a set isn't astronomical for OEM pads especially if you get 15-20,000 miles out of them.
Tyres though can be expensive, although again my OEM Dunlops are still going strong and not ready for changing for a few thousand yet.
_________________
06 T-Max Black Max
|
|
| Back to top |
|
pamnade
Newbie
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:35 am Post subject: Buying T Max |
|
|
Hi
Thanks for all your advise that is very helpfull. Looks like I'll be on the lookout for a mk2.
Didnt realise I'd be in bother for going straight in and asking a question, I thought this site was to encourage people to come into the scooter fold. Didn't see no rules and regs anywhere!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Ginger Phil
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 18362
Karma: +138
Location: Near Great Yarmouth, Norfolk
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's a Rules section at the top of the forum.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
MrGrumpy
I Like To Post A Lot!
Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 180
Karma: +6
Location: Teesside
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 3:50 pm Post subject: Re: Buying T Max |
|
|
| Max500 wrote: | | MrGrumpy wrote: |
Cons for mk2 - more expensive to run - the radial tyres are pricy, and 2 lots of brake pads & disks to replace!
Tim |
...but also as both discs work together, pad wear is halved over the same mileage, so they last a lot longer. I just checked mine at 7,500 miles and they were barely worn. the rear was slightly more worn but still not even halfway. The X9 would wear both front sets out in less miles, although the material thickness is a lot less when new than on the Yamaha pads.
£20 a set isn't astronomical for OEM pads especially if you get 15-20,000 miles out of them.
|
Obviously a light braker! Whilst my first set of pads lasted 11,000 miles, all the subsequent sets lasted 6000 miles! The replacements were EBC ones, so maybe I should have paid extra for Mr Yamaha's own labelled products. It may be £20 (or so) for the pads, but being mechanically incompetent and ignorant, I have to pay someone to fit them!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
graychap
Settling In Nicely
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 74
Karma: +5
Location: outer london/kent
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
